Invertebrate paleontology
Spring 2004
Reading:
Echinoderms: Gain insight in structure and way of life of various echinoderms. Modern groups (both thought to have been implicated in the Mesozoic Marine Revolution) are represented by sea urchins and starfish, Paleozoic groups by Crinoids. Sea urchins have a good fossil record from the Mesozoic; starfirsh have a very poor record because they tend to fall apart in separate plates.
Vertebrates: Gain insight in the morphology of skull bones, skull fenestration and teeth structure in various groups of vertebrates (fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals).
1. Sea urchins: there are 2 regular sea urchins (one plus spines) and 1 irregular species (sand dollar).
Regular sea urchins: Recognize the ambulacral fields and the interambulacral fields in two sea urchins with very different skeletal structure. Aristotle's lantern and madrepore plates usually fall out, but the madrepore plates are present in some specimens which in life had thin spines (p. 326; 337), living largely in rock crevices in the intertidal zone. Also note the separate Aristotle's lantern. The sea urchins with coarse spines (note p. 324, 335) tend to live somewhat further offshore, in shallow lagoons, while sand dollars live even further offshore, on more high-energy sand bars. Sand dollar: compare specimens with p. 327, 338; note lunules, position of mouth and anus, ambulacral fields.
2. Star fish: There are two different recent species, one smooth form (sandy-muddy shore lines) and one spiny form (living on coral reefs). Locate ambulacral fields, location of anus, madreporite plate; compare with situation in sea urchins.
3. Crinoids from the Crawfordsville (IN) Mississippian Limestone (about 340 Ma). See if you can distinguish the following: Are there plates in the calyx which are clearly visible and different from plates in the arms? Are the arms branched or not? Can you see pinnules on the arms? Are there any signs of the tegmen? Note that forms with a larger cup could eat larger meals (more space for stomach). Forms with very finely branched arms could catch only small prey (larger prey would damage the arms). Larger particles move on currents close to the ocean floor, smaller particles move higher. Which of these crinoids would have been very tall-stemmed?
#, Name Order Calyx? tegmen? Arms branched, pinnules? Tall stemmed or not? 2991: Cyathocrinites
multibrachiatus 'primitive' Cladida clear calyx, separated from arms,
tegmen not visible arms branched manifold, no pinnules
visible probably not (no fine
pinnules) 2992: Platicrinites
hemisphaericus Camerata calyx with many plates, tubercles,
no brachial plates; no tegmen visible arms branched multiple times,
pinnules visible yes 2295/2996: Agaricocrinus
americanus/splendens Camerata calyx small; brachial plates; no
tegmnen visible branched once; many
pinnules yes 3000: Uperocrinus
longirostris (=Bactocrinus) Camerata large calyx; brachial plates; no
tegmen visible arms branched once; pinnules; note
large anal tube probably not 3002: Onychocrinus
ulrichi Flexibilia small calix; tegmen not
visible arms branched, no
pinnules probably not 3003:Scytalocrinus
robustus (=Scaphiocrinus
porrectus) 'advanced' Cladida mid-sized calyx; brachial plates
present; tegmen not visible arms branched once; pinnules
visible in some specimens probably 3006: Barycrinus
crassibranchiatus (=princeps) 'primitive' Cladida calyx clearly visible, brachial
plates; tegmen not visible arms branched multiple times, no
pinnules visible probably not 3009: Gilbertsocrinus
tuberosus Camerata large tuberculate calyx, large
knobbed tegmen visible few times; no pinnules no
Note that one specimen of G. tuberosus and one of P. hemisphaericus have a cap-shaped snail (Platyceras infundibulum), which is often found on crinoids.
The additional rock : what other organisms than Crinoids were living here?
PART 2
Vertebrates:
There are 9 skulls, which belong to the following:
Identify which one is which; even if you recognize the skull immediately, make sure that you have arguments in favor of this recognition.
1=frog; homeodont (small); several but very reduced; insects; 4 legs; moist skin; NA
2=rattlesnake; homeodont however tricky this is (i.e. same shape although very different sizes); several; carnivorous; no legs; skin, scales; diapsid but very difficult because skull bones are strongly reduced and almost all holes.
3=bowfin fish, homeodont; many; carnivorous; fins; scales; NA
4=pig; heterodont; omnivorous; 1 bone lower jaw; 4 feet, hooves; skin/hair; yes, synapsid
5=crocodile; homeodont; several but intergrown; carnivorous; 4 feet; skin with heavy scales; yes, diapsid but skull covered with 'dermal bones' (heavy scales).
6=marsupial wolf, heterodont; 1 bone; carnivorous; 4 feet; skin with hair; yes, synapsid. One can see this is a marsupial because of presence of 4 incisors per half-jaw, shape of raer part of lower jaw.
7=snapping turtle, no teeth; several bones but strongly intergrown; carnivorous; 4 feet; scaly skin plus shield; no, anapsid.
8= gar, homeodont; several; carnivorous; fins; skin with scales; NA.
9= placental wolf, heterodont, 1 bone; carnivorous, 4 feet, skin with hair; yes, synpasid.