Spring 2004
Lecture 2: January 29
Reading:
Web resources for this lecture:
From the web: on Haeckel's pictures:
Lecture notes: Variation in fossils
How to sort fossils into morphological groups? Variations in size, shape, preservation, etc. Which one belong to one species? How to judge?
Species (see lecture 3):
Important to study variation within population. This is what makes the study of rare fossils so difficult. For example: human fossils are rare, and never are whole individuals preserved. Specimens found may have varied widely, main factors: age, sex. When we see fossils, how do we judge which specimens to put in the same 'species'? (i.e., morphological group); remember that with fossils we are always dealing with 'morphological species' (or morphospecies).
Variation within a species:
Plato: everything in the world is a vague shadow (shadow's on the wall of the cave) of the 'real' object. Thus everything is not really in its 'ideal' shape. Christianity: species were thoughts of God, created according to an ideal shape. Each species thus had its 'ideal shape', theoretical shape, never really reached in the real world. From Renaissance through to Darwin (and into today): type of the species (ideal form). Variability thus was seen as 'bad': deviation from an ideal shape (typological species concept).
Darwin: Natural selection: individuals compete, the ones who function better leave more offspring. Variability thus is an important component of living organisms, important factor in evolution (not 'bad'). Population concept of species: varying individuals make up a species.
Variation between individuals:
Ontogeny (history of an organism from zygote to adult):
Linkages between ontogeny and phylogeny (development of an evolutionary lineage). Many organisms show evidence of ancestors in their early life stages. Haeckel: ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. Human goes through 'fish-stage' (no real gills are present but a structure is present which is very similar to a strtucture in fish whch develops into the gills).
Haeckel's figures: recently much discussion that he falsified these, and strongly exaggerated the similarities between the various vertebrate groups (see web pages linked above). Embryos have features that are embryological (and thus have a function within the developing embryo), reveal nothing about evolution.
Most mammals: fairly gradual development. Many invertebrates: metamorphosis; e.g., larval stage free-swimming, adult fixed or slow-moving on bottom. Changes during growth: linked to what type of (if any) skeleton, exoskeleton (outside skeleton), endoskeleton (inside skeleton). Bones grow gradually, insects and lobsters molt in stages.
How to grow:
Many organisms mix and match (e.g., Nautilus: accretion, than formation of septum and new chamber).
How to study growth in fossil specimens?
Ontogenetic growth: how do size and shape change, jointly?
Allometric growth is commonly necessary as a result of the requirements of increased size; allometric growth is the rule, isometric growth is very rare.
Principle of similitude: the mass of an organism increases by a power of 3, while its cross-sectional area increases by the power of 2, its length by power of one: as animals grow larger, their limbs most become more robust, rather than just being larger versions of those of smaller animals. Gallileo (1638). See also reading by Gould (Ch. 21)
Also: convoluted surfaces in lungs, intestines: need to increase surface area in large organisms.
Thermoregulation: surface areas with regard to volume. Small animals loose heat very quickly (large surface area for volume); small animals with fixed body temperature must eat the whole day. Big animals risk heat stress.
Population variability:
Group of interbreeding individuals; share gene pool.
Ecophenotypic variation: variation in morphology that is NOT genetic. Plants, corals. Bees: all individuals genetically the same. Size strongly influenced. Sex in crocodiles (not genetically determined)
Sexual dimorphism.: How to spot in fossils?
Preservation modes: flattening, dissolution.