EES 227: Paleobiology
Spring 2004
return to
syllabus
Lecture 12: March 23
Reading:
- Chapter 8 textbook; emphasis on pages
141-end.
- Wells, M., 1998. How old is a fish? In:
Civilization and the limpet, p. 28-34
- Wells, M., 1998. The dilemma of the
jet set. In: Civilization and the limpet, p.
188-194
- S. J. Gould, 1994. The evolution of life
on Earth. Scientific American, October, p. 63-69; the text without
figures is available on the web: 'Contingency
of Evolution'.
Web resources for this lecture:
Lecture Notes: Paleoecology:
reconstruction of communities of organisms.
- Focused on one type of organism:
autecology (as discussed in Functional Morphology, see
lecture
11).
- Focused on community:
synecology
Communities are living on a small geographic
scale, short time scale. Community-scale processes not well expressed
in the fossil record. Focus of study shifted to larger-scale
processes: interaction of whole ecosystems and their
environments.
Ecological Hierarchy:
- Biosphere
- Ecosystem
- Community: how tightly knit? How
strong are interactions?
At level of organism:
- Habitat: physical environment of
an organism.
- Niche: physical, chemical,
biological environmental limits. Difficult to define, does it
exist if no organisms fill it?
Limiting factors
(physico-chemical):
- Temperature
- Oxygen content (water
dwellers)
- Precipitation (land
dwellers)
- Salinity (ocean dwellers; plants on
land)
- Substrate (sea), soil type
(land)
- Nutrients (primary producers); food
(heterotrophs)
How to define ecological terms?
Marine terminology:
- By where organisms live: shallow-deep
zones
- By how organisms feed: e.g, filter
feeders, detritus feeders, hebrivores, carnivores,
scavengers
- Energy flow within ecosystems (trophic
dynamics)
Food webs: complex interaction of
organisms, flow of energy through ecosystems. Complex
in present world: how to do this for ancient worlds?
Base of all food webs: primary
producers
- Dominantly: photosynthesis (use light
energy)
- Also: chemosynthesis (use chemical
energy): hydrothermal
vent faunas.
Examples of Ecological Principles used
in Paleoecology:
- Shape of 'food pyramid' on land and in
sea.
- Endothermic/Ectothermic food pyramids
(dinosaurs)
- Community succession
- Competition
Problems as well as opportunities: how
to do testable science?
- Difficult to reconstruct communities
(local community of organisms). Succession; replacement,
competition. Ecological processes occur on space-time scales which
are not easily caught in fossil record.
- Shift to larger-scale processes:
interaction of whole ecosystems and their
environments.
How has diversity changed over time?
Evolutionary Paleoecology
- Life on Earth: at least since 3.5
Ga.
- Enormous increase in the number of
species on Earth, as well as in the disparity: Early life on
Earth: Archaea and Bacteria only; life in oceans
only.
- How and when present great biological
diversity?
Difficulties in estimating of
diversity of life over time:
- Fewer old rocks than young rocks
preserved; deep-sea floor subducted (oldest deep-sea floor ~ 200
Ma, Jurassic).
- State of preservation generally
decreases with greater age.
- Amount of fossil-bearing rocks does not
simply decrease with time: periods of low sea level
had small regions of shallow oceans, few fossil bearing
rocks.
- 'Monograph effect': some intervals if
time better studied than others
- Soft-bodied species do not
usually fossilize; any time period for which such a locality
exists with special preservation (Lagerstatten, see
lecture
1) will appear to have an
unusually high number of species.
In reconstructing past diversity reliably,
we can thus only use some groups, the most common of which are all
marine, shallow-water invertebrates with shells (e.g., Brachiopoda,
Mollusca. Cnidaria, Echinodermata).
Which taxonomic units do we use in
trying to study changes in diversity over time?
- Number of species ideal, for most cases
not known; use genera or families (see discussion in
lecture
8) on mass
extinctions,
- Only a single of a larger unit (say, a
family) needs to be found as a fossil to recognize the whole
family as 'present'. We have thus a pretty good chance of finding
at least one species of such a large grouping.
Diversity of Life
during the Phanerozoic (textbook pages 140-141):
- Marine organisms (left ): at the
beginning of the Cambrium (about 545 Ma) hard-shelled animals
became common (lecture Cambrian
explosion). Abundances of species
and higher units increased until the end of the Silurian Period
(with some periods of decrease), remained overall stable during
the Paleozoic, then a sharp drop at the mass extinction at
the end of the Paleozoic (lecture
8). Diversity recovered gradually
during the Triassic Period, kept increasing, and went up sharply
during the Cretaceous. At the end of the Cretaceous the second
largest mass extinction set diversity back again. During the
Cenozoic there has been a steady increase.
- Land organisms (right ): life on
land (insects, amphibians, plants) started toward the end of the
Silurian, increased during the Devonian Period, and really took
off during the Carboniferous. The mass extinction at the end of
the Paleozoic also set back diversity on land (lecture
8). After recovery, diversity
increased during the Mesozoic, with a strong increase in the
Cretaceous, a small fall-back at the end of the Cretaceous (mass
extinction, lecture
8), and strong increase ever
after until today.
Family-level diversity of marine and
continental organisms, showing a strong overall increase over the
Phanerozoic (S. M. Kidwell and J. J. Sepkoski: The Nature of the
Fossil Record. Paleontological Society Spec. Publ. 9, 1999, p.
61-76); the lower curves indicate the knowledge in 1982, the upper
curves in 1992.
Why this pattern of
diversity?
Overall seen as resulting from various
biotic innovations, biotic interactiuons, interrupted by mass
extinctions.
Innovations
Largest scale: Cambrian explosion,
establishment life on land:
Major innovation in marine realm:
tiering. 'Layers' of habitats on ocean floor, with
organisms sticking out above the sediment and collecting food by
sieving sea water at various levels. Animals crawl over the mud,
and burrowing to various depths. In the beginning of the Paleozoic
this tiering did not exist, and animals lives only on and
shallow in the sediment (no deep burrowers).
Mass extinctions: main causes probably
external to the biota lecture
8. Mass extinctions may be followed
by periods of not just recovery, but also reorganization of
ecosystems. Example: biota living in shallow oceans (inner shelf)
move off-shore. Trilobites after extinctions at end Cambrian replaced
by brachiopods/crinoids; these were after end Permian extinction
replaced by molluscs.
In species, periods of stasis are said to
alternate with periods of rapid change (punctuated
equilibrium; lecture
6).
Do alternations between stasis
and rapid change involve communities of organisms and whole
ecosystems? Strongly debated by paleontologists; ecosystems varying
from local to global, and time scales from a few million years to the
whole Phanerozoic.
Evolutionary Faunas have been
recognized over the last 545 Ma (Jack Sepkoski; text book p.
140-141). In such EFs we describe the occurrence of guilds,
groups of animals that make their living in specific ways. We
distinguish, for instance, organisms that sieve their food from the
water (suspension feeders), organisms that eat mud and digest the
organic matter (detritivores), carnivores,
scavengers.
- Cambrian Evolutionary Fauna: 540
to 510 Ma; trilobites, inarticulate brachiopods, and ancient
snail-like creatures. Low diversity, mainly detritivores and
carnivores; few suspension feeders; few planktonic and swimming
organisms; simple food webs were probably simple.
Tiering little developed.
- Paleozoic Evolutionary Faunas:
510 through 250 Ma; corals, articulate brachiopods, rich
Echinodermata, mollusca (clams, snails and squid) and floating
graptolites. Increased diversity, suspension feeders common, in
addition to detritivores and carnivores, tiering; planktonic and
swimming organisms common; food webs of intermediate
complexity.
- Modern Evolutionary Fauna: 250
Ma-now. Common mollusca(particularly snails, and clams), fish in
the water column, sea urchins as most common Echinodermata, marine
reptiles/mammals. Diversity high, suspension feeders, detritivores
and carnivores, Tiering is very complex (but epifaunal tall
orgnisms died during out during mesozoic; text book p. 143),
planktonic and swimming organisms common, food webs
highly complex.
These Evolutionary Faunas reflect increased
diversity as organisms detected or invented more and
more different ways to make a living, although
set back by mass extinctions. Note major increase in diversity during
Mesozoic: Mesozoic Marine Revolution. Note that during these
revolutions life became more and more energy-intensive: faster
swimming, more active life styles, more predators.
Punctuated equilibrium theory thus discusses an
alternation of periods of stasis and periods of rapid change on the
level of species, i.e. within a group of related organisms,
without looking at the complete ecosystem in which these organisms
function. A similar alternation of periods of stasis and period of
rapid change has been proposed for ecosystems, but at various time
and space scales.
- EVOLUTIONARY FAUNAS: 3 in 540 Ma,
global. Evolution of diverse groups; appearance of main guilds.
Diversification of life, discovering and inventing new niches to
live in and new ways to make a living; disrupted by large
extinctions.
Why would ecosystems be
stable?
- 'Incumbency': if someone is in
place, (s)he is difficult to dislodge. The incumbent species has
the advantage over a species trying to migrate in because
there are already so many specimens of these species present.
Immigrant species have small populations, which can easily become
extinct as a result of relatively small environmental
disturbances.
- 'Ecological locking':
interactions between existing species make it more difficult for
immigrant species to become established because the immigrant
species does not easily fit into the existing network of
connections between species, and thus can not compete. Immigrants
can move in successfully only when the existing ecosystem has been
disturbed.
The response of ecosystem to changes in the
environment is thus not simple: for long periods, continual changes
have little effect on the biota which can tolerate the changes, until
a very small additional change is the 'straw that broke the camel's
back', and the system collapses.
Relatively rapid changes in the environment
that have been implicated include changes in climate, changes in sea
level, changes in the amount of oxygen dissolved in sea water,
changing ocean currents as continents move and collide, the number of
continents, impacting meteorites and erupting volcanoes: the same
causes as invoked for mass extinctions (lecture
8).
There is thus a tendency in modern
paleontological research to emphasize the role of environmental
changes of various kinds in evolutionary/ecological processes,
but there is vigorous debate over the relative
importance of the interaction of biota with each other, and the
interaction with the environment (which in its turn could have been
influenced by biota). Both groups recognize that both ecological
interaction/diversification and mass extinctions occurred. The
question remains: which is the most important? Recent studies appear
to emphasize the major, rapid increases in diversity as dominating
the process, thus giving more weight to the competitive
process.